Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Should I Use CamelCase For Oauth2?

So i'm trying to implement an oauth2 server in nestjs and i've been reading the specification [RFC 6749] In the spec, all the query parameter names and even json response use snake

Solution 1:

The parameters are required to be spelled exactly as defined in the specification, you can't arbitrarily rename them and still be conforming to the specification.

accessToken is a completely different parameter than access_token, and any client implementing the specification will expect you to use the correct name, access_token, as defined in the spec. Serving up a parameter called accessToken is no different than serving up a parameter called foobar, as far as clients are concerned.


Post a Comment for "Should I Use CamelCase For Oauth2?"